Skip to main content

SID codes (part 1)

One thing that I only learned about after using Discogs is the so called Source Identification Code, or SID. These codes were introduced in 1994 to combat piracy and to find out on which machines a CD was made. It was introduced by Philips and adopted by IFPI, and specifications are publicly available which clearly describe the two available SID codes (mastering SID code and mould SID code).

Since quite a few months Discogs has two fields available in the "Barcode and Other Identifiers" (BaOI) section:
  • Mould SID code
  • Mastering SID code
A few questions immediately popped up in my mind:
  1. how many releases don't have a SID field defined when there should be (for example, the free text field indicates it is a SID field)?
  2. how many releases have a SID field with values that should not be in the SID field?
  3. how many release have a SID field, but a wrong year (as SID codes were only introduced in 1994)
  4. how many vinyl releases have a SID code defined (which is impossible, as SIDs are specific to CDs, DVDs, SACD, BluRay, etc.)
In this blogpost I am going to answer the first question. I will try to answer the other questions in later blogposts.

Releases in Discogs with a SID field

I grabbed the latest data dump from Discogs (with all releases until November 1 2017) and looked at how many releases have a SID code defined, but don't have it in the SID field.

Like with other fields there are lots of misspellings of the names of the SID codes (check the scripts to see what I found). It confirmed once again that having structured data helps (not saying "fixes", just "helps").

First of all I looked at how many releases actually have a SID code defined. There are 111479 Mastering SID Code fields in 65877 releases. Looking at how these release are distributed over time, I can see the following (first bar has release numbers < 1 million, second bar releases between 1 million and 2 million, third bar between 2 million and 3 million, etc.):

For Mould SID Code fields there are similar numbers: 180360 fields in 78986 releases and the distribution looks almost the same:

It is not surprising that there are not many releases in the last bar, as there were a bit over 80,000 releases with a release number bigger than 11,000,000 in the latest Discogs dump (with data until November 1 2017).

What is surprising that most of the SID codes are in the oldest releases. I have no idea what is going on here (and that sounds like a good research question for a future blogpost), but a few possible explanations are:
  • older releases are better maintained
  • there are relatively more older releases than newer releases because of merges (this sounds a bit like a contradiction, but when people add duplicate releases those releases are merged, so it might be that the problem space for newer releases is a bit more "sparse"
Older releases appear to be better maintained.

Releases missing a SID field

Next I looked at how many fields are there that have indicated that there is a SID code of some sorts but the field wasn't a Mastering SID Code field or Mould SID Code field. It must be said that this is a bit of a conservative guess, and likely a few thousand entries are missing.

My scripts could find 12795 mould codes in 12315 releases. These were distributed as follows:

I could find 13003 mastering SID codes in 12807 releases, distributed as follows:

What immediately stands out is the very sharp drop which happened somewhere around release 4,500,000 (or perhaps a bit earlier). I didn't check, but this could very well coincide with the introduction of the SID code fields. If this is indeed the case, then it seems to suggest that contributors actually do use new fields when those are introduced.
Statistics clearly show that contributors use new fields that are introduced.
What puzzles me is why the number of releases with SID code fields didn't go up significantly. I'll leave that for another time.
Labels:

Comments

  1. YK2080March 18, 2023 at 9:36 AM

    Hi. Very interesting publication. I've registered with blogspot in order to get more details :). I collect Michael Jackson CBS/Epic / Sony/Epic as well as Motown CDs pressed till July 2009 and it I can hardly find information of data pressing simply reading disc matrix. This article (https://musicbrainz.org/place/1e289355-7887-4cdc-a537-63bfbbd1d870) was quite helpful, but it nothing more. Is there any information how to read Sony and Motown CDs matrix to get info of pressings dates? And statistics of CDs pressed. Is it restricted data or it could be found?
    P.S. I have my XLS catalogue with absolute details of each CD in collection (700+) which might be helpful

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SPARS codes (part 1)

Let's talk about SPARS codes used on CDs (or CD-like formats). You have most likely seen it used, but maybe don't know its name. The SPARS code is a three letter code indicating if recording, mixing and mastering were analogue or digital. For example they could look like the ones below. There is not a fixed format, so there are other variants as well. Personally I am not paying too much attention to these codes (I simply do not care), but in the classical music world if something was labeled as DDD (so everything digital) companies could ask premium prices. That makes it interesting information to mine and unlock, which is something that Discogs does not allow people to do when searching (yet!) even though it could be a helpful filter. I wanted to see if it can be used as an identifier to tell releases apart (are there similar releases where the only difference is the SPARS code?). SPARS code in Discogs Since a few months SPARS is a separate field in the Discogs ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using matrix numbers of CDs to verify release years (1)

One of the first steps when making CDs is to produce a "glass master". From that (using a few more steps) a "stamper" is created which is then used to press the actual CDs. When looking at a CD you can often see text in a ring in the middle of the CD. This is the so called matrix which comes from the glass master. Apart from the matrix other text (like the IFPI mastering SID code) could possibly also come from the glass master. A bit of background information can be found on page 7 of the IFPI SID code implementation guide although I would also highly recommend watching some of the clips about glass masters on YouTube, which are highly informative. One company making a lot of these glass masters is Cinram . For most of their glass masters they stored the production date in matrix. This is good news, because it means that it could possibly be used to verify releases and see if the declared year of the release is right: it could never have been released before...
Post a Comment
Read more