Skip to main content

Rights Society fields in the Discogs database (part 1)

One of the fields in the "Barcode and Other Identifiers" section of a release in Discogs is the Rights Society field. These societies are for things like collecting royalties for artists, although I have no idea how they exactly work (and, to be honest, I am not that interested in knowing at the moment). Examples of rights societies are ASCAP, GEMA, BUMA, SGAE and more.

The Rights Society field has been around in Discogs for some time, but still quite a few errors are being made. For example, I often see the Other field being used, but also ISRC, Barcode and other fields.

A while ago I added support for detecting these to my scripts, and recently refined detection so I could write this blog with some more accurate information.

Rights Society errors

In the latest Discogs data dump you will find about 30,000 releases where the Rights Society field is not used where it possibly should have been used. This excludes instances of where the value is actually not a rights society, which also tends to happen (this is future research).

The releases with known errors are distributed across the data as follows:

Distribution of Rights Society field errors in the Discogs data
 What is immediately obvious is that there is a big spike and then the problem almost seems to disappear. My guess is that this happened around the time when the Rights Society field was introduced and people actively started using it.

ISRC fields used for Rights Society

One interesting find is that I sometimes saw that the ISRC field was used when Rights Society should be used. The reason is very obvious if you edit a release: ISRC is the option right above Rights Society in the drop down box and people just chose the wrong option, without checking before they submitted their release to the database. This doesn't happen very often: 31 times (although I am sure that I missed a few entries, and I will revisit this in a future post).

ISRC fields used when Rights Society should have been used
The distribution of fields also shows a recent spike: this is when the ISRC field was introduced. The older ones are releases where data was later added and the wrong field was used.

Barcode fields used for Rights Society

Finally I looked at how often Barcode is used when Rights Society should have been used. There are two reasons for this:
  1. Barcode is the default setting when adding a new entry in "Barcodes and Other Identifiers"
  2. Barcode is the setting below Rights Society in the drop down box for "Barcodes and Other Identifiers"
meaning that there are two opportunities for people to make a mistake. Here it is a bit over 400 releases that are wrong.

Barcode fields used when Rights Society should have been used
What is striking is that here the distribution of the error across the dataset is a lot more uniform.

What is interesting to see is that there are three different errors, with three completely different distributions across the data. In a future blogpost I will focus a bit more on the content of Rights Society fields. I already know that it has been used for label codes, but there are probably more errors.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SID codes (part 1)

One thing that I only learned about after using Discogs is the so called Source Identification Code, or SID. These codes were introduced in 1994 to combat piracy and to find out on which machines a CD was made. It was introduced by Philips and adopted by IFPI, and specifications are publicly available which clearly describe the two available SID codes (mastering SID code and mould SID code). Since quite a few months Discogs has two fields available in the " Barcode and Other Identifiers " (BaOI) section: Mould SID code Mastering SID code A few questions immediately popped up in my mind: how many releases don't have a SID field defined when there should be (for example, the free text field indicates it is a SID field)? how many releases have a SID field with values that should not be in the SID field? how many release have a SID field, but a wrong year (as SID codes were only introduced in 1994) how many vinyl releases have a SID code defined (which is impossi...
1 comment
Read more

SPARS codes (part 1)

Let's talk about SPARS codes used on CDs (or CD-like formats). You have most likely seen it used, but maybe don't know its name. The SPARS code is a three letter code indicating if recording, mixing and mastering were analogue or digital. For example they could look like the ones below. There is not a fixed format, so there are other variants as well. Personally I am not paying too much attention to these codes (I simply do not care), but in the classical music world if something was labeled as DDD (so everything digital) companies could ask premium prices. That makes it interesting information to mine and unlock, which is something that Discogs does not allow people to do when searching (yet!) even though it could be a helpful filter. I wanted to see if it can be used as an identifier to tell releases apart (are there similar releases where the only difference is the SPARS code?). SPARS code in Discogs Since a few months SPARS is a separate field in the Discogs ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Country statistics (part 2)

One thing I wondered about: for how many releases is the country field changed? I looked at the two most recent data dumps (covering February and March 2019) and see where they differed. In total 5274 releases "moved". The top 20 moves are: unknown -> US: 454 Germany -> Europe: 319 UK & Europe -> Europe: 217 unknown -> UK: 178 UK -> Europe: 149 Netherlands -> Europe: 147 unknown -> Europe: 139 unknown -> Germany: 120 UK -> US: 118 Europe -> Germany: 84 US -> UK: 79 USA & Canada -> US: 76 US -> Canada: 65 unknown -> France: 64 UK -> UK & Europe: 62 UK & Europe -> UK: 51 France -> Europe: 51 Saudi Arabia -> United Arab Emirates: 49 US -> Europe: 46 unknown -> Japan: 45 When you think about it these all make sense (there was a big consolidation in Europe in the 1980s and releases for multiple countries were made in a single pressing plant) but there are also a few weird changes:...
Post a Comment
Read more