Time to look at ISRC codes again because I am still not done researching them. If you don't know what it is, I would suggest that you first read part 1, part 2 and part 3. To better understand some of my complaints below you should also read about why I think that Discogs stores the ISRC fields in the wrong place.
So now that we've got that out of the way we can start. The ISRC field in Discogs is in the "Barcodes and Other Identifiers" (BaOI) section, which I already explained is not the correct place and it should be with the individual tracks. Right now people are using descriptions (a free text field) to indicate which ISRC code belongs to which release.
Because I know how bad people are with typing in correct information (and of course I am not immune to this) I was wondering in how many releases people make mistakes. I added a very simple check to my scripts to see if descriptions were being reused (copy/paste errors, or "off by one" errors). With the latest data dump I was pleasantly surprise to only find 27 releases with duplicate descriptions with my current check. Not bad, but I am still very much convinced that ISRC codes should not be with the BaOI field in the vast majority of cases.
So now that we've got that out of the way we can start. The ISRC field in Discogs is in the "Barcodes and Other Identifiers" (BaOI) section, which I already explained is not the correct place and it should be with the individual tracks. Right now people are using descriptions (a free text field) to indicate which ISRC code belongs to which release.
Because I know how bad people are with typing in correct information (and of course I am not immune to this) I was wondering in how many releases people make mistakes. I added a very simple check to my scripts to see if descriptions were being reused (copy/paste errors, or "off by one" errors). With the latest data dump I was pleasantly surprise to only find 27 releases with duplicate descriptions with my current check. Not bad, but I am still very much convinced that ISRC codes should not be with the BaOI field in the vast majority of cases.
Comments
Post a Comment