Skip to main content

Digging into the Spanish Depósito Legal identifier (part 4)

Time to dive into one of my pet subjects: the Spanish depósito legal numbers on releases. For morebackground information about this specific identifier it is recommended to first read parts 1, 2 and 3.

I like the depósito legal number, as it gives good information about when a release was made, or at least it gives a lower bound cut off value (sometimes these numbers are used for reissues as well). But there are people who either don't understand the importance of this identifier, or don't care. This is not just people contributing to Discogs but also people making the releases, as there are many incomplete or impossible versions printed on releases. Especially the latter is weird, as it would be similar to misprinting the ISBN number on a book (although I am sure that must happen as well!).

So, I looked at a few smells that I search for to see how often they appear and where using the data dump made on April 1 2019. As always, the labels for the bars mean the range of releases in the Discogs database (currently above 13 million).

Depósito Legal in the Barcode field

First: when do people use the barcode field? When adding a field in "Barcodes and Other Identifiers" (BaOI) the default choice is "Barcode" and some people might not change it. That looks like this:



Interesting. The "Depósito Legal" field was made an option in BaOI some time ago, yet this particular error is mostly present in later releases. After a bit of digging through the data: the reason is that there is a single user that has added a lot of releases recently but didn't bother to use the correct field. Rankhunting time!

Impossible years

Another one: impossible years. Although some of these are false positives due to errors in my scripts (I need to fix those) most of these are misspellings, for example "1191" instead of "1991" for the year component:



These don't happen too often, but they still appear every now and then. The peak can explained by the fact that DL only became a first class citizen in Discogs not too long ago, and there are lots of errors hidden in either notes sections, or the "Other" field in BaOI or other entries in BaOI, which is next

Depósito Legal in other BaOI fields





It is clear when the DL field was added and this graph confirms suspicions of the previous graph.

Depósito Legal as catalog number

Some people mistake the DL for a catalog number, but luckily not many:



Depósito Legal in the Notes field

Some people add the DL to the "Notes" field, instead of to BaOI. My scripts search for references to DL there as well, but without verifying if they are false positives. Quite often they are, but there are still plenty of releases where they are true positives. DL in the "Notes" section are distributed over Discogs like this:



I am sure there are other interesting statistics that can be derived from this, but I will leave that for another time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SID codes (part 1)

One thing that I only learned about after using Discogs is the so called Source Identification Code, or SID. These codes were introduced in 1994 to combat piracy and to find out on which machines a CD was made. It was introduced by Philips and adopted by IFPI, and specifications are publicly available which clearly describe the two available SID codes (mastering SID code and mould SID code). Since quite a few months Discogs has two fields available in the " Barcode and Other Identifiers " (BaOI) section: Mould SID code Mastering SID code A few questions immediately popped up in my mind: how many releases don't have a SID field defined when there should be (for example, the free text field indicates it is a SID field)? how many releases have a SID field with values that should not be in the SID field? how many release have a SID field, but a wrong year (as SID codes were only introduced in 1994) how many vinyl releases have a SID code defined (which is impossi

SPARS codes (part 1)

Let's talk about SPARS codes used on CDs (or CD-like formats). You have most likely seen it used, but maybe don't know its name. The SPARS code is a three letter code indicating if recording, mixing and mastering were analogue or digital. For example they could look like the ones below. There is not a fixed format, so there are other variants as well. Personally I am not paying too much attention to these codes (I simply do not care), but in the classical music world if something was labeled as DDD (so everything digital) companies could ask premium prices. That makes it interesting information to mine and unlock, which is something that Discogs does not allow people to do when searching (yet!) even though it could be a helpful filter. I wanted to see if it can be used as an identifier to tell releases apart (are there similar releases where the only difference is the SPARS code?). SPARS code in Discogs Since a few months SPARS is a separate field in the Discogs

Country statistics (part 2)

One thing I wondered about: for how many releases is the country field changed? I looked at the two most recent data dumps (covering February and March 2019) and see where they differed. In total 5274 releases "moved". The top 20 moves are: unknown -> US: 454 Germany -> Europe: 319 UK & Europe -> Europe: 217 unknown -> UK: 178 UK -> Europe: 149 Netherlands -> Europe: 147 unknown -> Europe: 139 unknown -> Germany: 120 UK -> US: 118 Europe -> Germany: 84 US -> UK: 79 USA & Canada -> US: 76 US -> Canada: 65 unknown -> France: 64 UK -> UK & Europe: 62 UK & Europe -> UK: 51 France -> Europe: 51 Saudi Arabia -> United Arab Emirates: 49 US -> Europe: 46 unknown -> Japan: 45 When you think about it these all make sense (there was a big consolidation in Europe in the 1980s and releases for multiple countries were made in a single pressing plant) but there are also a few weird changes: