Skip to main content

Barcodes (part 4)

Continuing with my research into barcodes in the Discogs database: which barcodes appear most often? If you haven't already I would recommend reading part 1, part 2 and part 3 of this series first.

One thing that I was wondering about is which barcodes are found the most. The top 10 values for the barcode field looks like this:
  1. 1411: 4820011260011
  2. 1252: 4 820011 260011 >
  3. 827: 6456489431561
  4. 826: 6 456489 431561
  5. 460: 4 64043 51662 9
  6. 455: 464043516629
  7. 447: 4 60980-06754 5
  8. 437: 4 619497 411525
  9. 429: 4619497411525
  10. 427: 460980067545
Because one release could have multiple barcode fields (frequently one for the text representation and one for the scanned version) there is some overlap and the top 10 is actually just 5 different barcodes.

I was wondering which release was at number one and to my surprise it was a release by Dissection. To my knowledge the majority of the people on Discogs are not into extreme metal, so I looked a bit further at what other releases have this barcode: Judas Priest, Depeche Mode, Jimi Hendrix, ...

OK, something is going on here. Deeper inspection reveals that these are all releases that are coming from Ukraine and are unofficial pirate pressings. So there is a bootlegger in Ukraine pressing CDs and using the same barcode for all releases. That should definitely make it easier to block on the Discogs marketplace, because right now (as I am writing, expecting this to change soon) it seems only half of them are.

Then the next barcode (3 and 4 in the top 10): pirate pressings from Russia. Barcodes 5/6: pirate pressings from Russia. Barcodes 7/10: pirate pressings from Russia. Barcodes 8/9: pirate pressings from Russia. Hm. For these pressings the barcode really isn't helpful to distinguish between different releases.

I scrolled a bit further down the list to find a barcode that was not for pirate pressings (many are), but where there were still quite a few releases as those are likely interesting. I expected to find them for the big artists, but more in the range of 40 or 50 releases. I actually found something a lot more interesting.

If you search for the barcode 016026205218 you will find many releases (500+) and they are definitely not (all) pirates. At first I thought this was mostly more "copy to draft" sloppiness where people used another release as a template but upon closer inspection it turns out the barcode actually is on different releases. You can see for yourself by looking at this release and comparing it with this other release.

It got even stranger when seeing that it is used on CD, vinyl and cassette, across many labels and genres, and on official and unofficial releases. So what happened here? Was this particular barcode a standard code in Italy on all releases? It is very puzzling. What is sure is that, like the pirate releases, the barcode is completely useless for these (mostly) Italian releases.

In the next part I will dive into something else related to barcodes in Dicsogs, although I am not yet sure what.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SID codes (part 1)

One thing that I only learned about after using Discogs is the so called Source Identification Code, or SID. These codes were introduced in 1994 to combat piracy and to find out on which machines a CD was made. It was introduced by Philips and adopted by IFPI, and specifications are publicly available which clearly describe the two available SID codes (mastering SID code and mould SID code). Since quite a few months Discogs has two fields available in the " Barcode and Other Identifiers " (BaOI) section: Mould SID code Mastering SID code A few questions immediately popped up in my mind: how many releases don't have a SID field defined when there should be (for example, the free text field indicates it is a SID field)? how many releases have a SID field with values that should not be in the SID field? how many release have a SID field, but a wrong year (as SID codes were only introduced in 1994) how many vinyl releases have a SID code defined (which is impossi...
1 comment
Read more

SPARS codes (part 1)

Let's talk about SPARS codes used on CDs (or CD-like formats). You have most likely seen it used, but maybe don't know its name. The SPARS code is a three letter code indicating if recording, mixing and mastering were analogue or digital. For example they could look like the ones below. There is not a fixed format, so there are other variants as well. Personally I am not paying too much attention to these codes (I simply do not care), but in the classical music world if something was labeled as DDD (so everything digital) companies could ask premium prices. That makes it interesting information to mine and unlock, which is something that Discogs does not allow people to do when searching (yet!) even though it could be a helpful filter. I wanted to see if it can be used as an identifier to tell releases apart (are there similar releases where the only difference is the SPARS code?). SPARS code in Discogs Since a few months SPARS is a separate field in the Discogs ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Country statistics (part 2)

One thing I wondered about: for how many releases is the country field changed? I looked at the two most recent data dumps (covering February and March 2019) and see where they differed. In total 5274 releases "moved". The top 20 moves are: unknown -> US: 454 Germany -> Europe: 319 UK & Europe -> Europe: 217 unknown -> UK: 178 UK -> Europe: 149 Netherlands -> Europe: 147 unknown -> Europe: 139 unknown -> Germany: 120 UK -> US: 118 Europe -> Germany: 84 US -> UK: 79 USA & Canada -> US: 76 US -> Canada: 65 unknown -> France: 64 UK -> UK & Europe: 62 UK & Europe -> UK: 51 France -> Europe: 51 Saudi Arabia -> United Arab Emirates: 49 US -> Europe: 46 unknown -> Japan: 45 When you think about it these all make sense (there was a big consolidation in Europe in the 1980s and releases for multiple countries were made in a single pressing plant) but there are also a few weird changes:...
Post a Comment
Read more