Skip to main content

Reading miniscule details on music releases

When adding a release to Discogs it is important to record as much detail as possible. This means looking at physical releases, discovering what data is there and then entering it. But it is sometimes very difficult to see what actually is on a release. A big challenge is optical media, where some data (such as SID codes) is sometimes unreadable because it is so small. The result: people are missing information, or enter the wrong information.

You basically have no other choice than to magnify. And what better tool to use than a camera? So far I have tried a few things. One thing I tried is a cheap endoscope (originally bought to see deep inside the guts of audio equipment in need of repair), but that is something I would most definitely not recommended, as it is essentially a bad webcam with ditto quality. I also looked at a USB microscope but those are either very expensive, or also webcam quality.

Also, I already have a camera that gives me very good quality pictures, namely my phone. The drawback is that there is no optical zoom (although some zoom can be faked in software), so making really good close ups is difficult.

When making a picture of a CD with SID code I end up with something like this:


which is kind of OK. I can read the SID code (IFPI 0715) but it isn't exactly clear (granted: this was under less than ideal light conditions).

Recently I bumped into some lenses that could transform my phone into a microscope, which sounded interesting. This was originally a project on Kickstarter which is not necessarily a recommendation, as there is a ton of crap on Kickstarter, but this got good reviews, so I ordered a set and tried it.

It arrived and contained a few lenses (I had ordered the full set), in a neat package.


and I decided to try it with the same CD:


As you can see: it is now very easy to see the SID code. I am sure will be using these a lot more for hard to read details and I highly recommend these lenses. Impressive.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SID codes (part 1)

One thing that I only learned about after using Discogs is the so called Source Identification Code, or SID. These codes were introduced in 1994 to combat piracy and to find out on which machines a CD was made. It was introduced by Philips and adopted by IFPI, and specifications are publicly available which clearly describe the two available SID codes (mastering SID code and mould SID code). Since quite a few months Discogs has two fields available in the " Barcode and Other Identifiers " (BaOI) section: Mould SID code Mastering SID code A few questions immediately popped up in my mind: how many releases don't have a SID field defined when there should be (for example, the free text field indicates it is a SID field)? how many releases have a SID field with values that should not be in the SID field? how many release have a SID field, but a wrong year (as SID codes were only introduced in 1994) how many vinyl releases have a SID code defined (which is impossi

SPARS codes (part 1)

Let's talk about SPARS codes used on CDs (or CD-like formats). You have most likely seen it used, but maybe don't know its name. The SPARS code is a three letter code indicating if recording, mixing and mastering were analogue or digital. For example they could look like the ones below. There is not a fixed format, so there are other variants as well. Personally I am not paying too much attention to these codes (I simply do not care), but in the classical music world if something was labeled as DDD (so everything digital) companies could ask premium prices. That makes it interesting information to mine and unlock, which is something that Discogs does not allow people to do when searching (yet!) even though it could be a helpful filter. I wanted to see if it can be used as an identifier to tell releases apart (are there similar releases where the only difference is the SPARS code?). SPARS code in Discogs Since a few months SPARS is a separate field in the Discogs

Country statistics (part 2)

One thing I wondered about: for how many releases is the country field changed? I looked at the two most recent data dumps (covering February and March 2019) and see where they differed. In total 5274 releases "moved". The top 20 moves are: unknown -> US: 454 Germany -> Europe: 319 UK & Europe -> Europe: 217 unknown -> UK: 178 UK -> Europe: 149 Netherlands -> Europe: 147 unknown -> Europe: 139 unknown -> Germany: 120 UK -> US: 118 Europe -> Germany: 84 US -> UK: 79 USA & Canada -> US: 76 US -> Canada: 65 unknown -> France: 64 UK -> UK & Europe: 62 UK & Europe -> UK: 51 France -> Europe: 51 Saudi Arabia -> United Arab Emirates: 49 US -> Europe: 46 unknown -> Japan: 45 When you think about it these all make sense (there was a big consolidation in Europe in the 1980s and releases for multiple countries were made in a single pressing plant) but there are also a few weird changes: