It's time for a very short post. In the last few days I spent some more time digging into Creative Commons licensed releases in the Discogs database. In a previous post I already looked a bit into it, but it was far from complete and likely I missed a few releases that have content under Creative Commons, but that I didn't identify.
One thing that I added to my scripts recently was to look for a very specific word that is used in many Creative Commons license statements, namely ShareAlike. I added this to my scripts, grabbed the latest datadump (which is newer than the one I used last time, and also contains data added in November 2017) and reran my scripts.
The result is that I found 82 more releases than last time. It should be noted that in one release the Creative Commons statement was actually removed and 31 releases seem to be new. That leaves around 50 releases which have the ShareAlike statement, but which I didn't recognize before as a released licensed under a Creative Commons license. I should probably start looking for some of the other statements that are common as well. I will leave that for a future post.
One thing that I added to my scripts recently was to look for a very specific word that is used in many Creative Commons license statements, namely ShareAlike. I added this to my scripts, grabbed the latest datadump (which is newer than the one I used last time, and also contains data added in November 2017) and reran my scripts.
The result is that I found 82 more releases than last time. It should be noted that in one release the Creative Commons statement was actually removed and 31 releases seem to be new. That leaves around 50 releases which have the ShareAlike statement, but which I didn't recognize before as a released licensed under a Creative Commons license. I should probably start looking for some of the other statements that are common as well. I will leave that for a future post.
Comments
Post a Comment